CONFERENCE AND SMALL-GROUP SCHEDULE
The general plan for the conference is to have two plenary sessions, one at the beginning on Friday morning (October 1, 2010) and one at the end on Saturday morning (October 2, 2010). In between, besides lunch and dinner on Friday (at both of which there will be presentations, currently being planned), everything will consist of small-group sessions. Specifically, we’ll have 4 90-minute time-slots for small-group meetings: Friday at 10:45 AM, 2:15 PM and 4:00 PM, and Saturday at 9:00 AM. So the full conference will be structured this way (except that all the times here may be moved a few minutes in one direction or another as we complete our plans):
FRIDAY, OCTOBER 1:
9:00 – 10:30 Welcome, and
first plenary
10:45 – 12:15 First meeting time for small
groups
12:30 – 2:00 Lunch session
2:15 – 3:45 Second
meeting time for small groups
4:00 – 5:30 Third meeting time for
small groups
7:00 Dinner session
SATURDAY, OCTOBER 2:
9:00
– 10:30 Fourth meeting time for small groups
10:45 – 12:15
Closing plenary
With 4 time-slots for small group sessions, and 32 papers, we plan to have 8 papers presented in each of the 4 available small-group meeting times. With that in mind, we’ve organized the papers into 4 themes: (1) organizing and delivering clinical legal education; (2) ethics, jurisprudence, and engagement with clients; (3) pedagogy; and (4) beyond individual litigation: groups, transactions, and policy clinics. In each of the 4 small-group slots, there will be 4 separate small group meetings, one for each of these four themes.
You’ll see, of course, that these categories overlap and many of the papers could easily fit in more than one of them. The value of the categories is just heuristic – to help everyone who is part of the conference to get a handle on the wealth of material they’re going to have a chance to engage with. Some conference attenders may only want to go to sessions from a particular theme; others may want to be sure to attend one session from each of the 4 themes; and still others may choose their preferences with no regard to the themes under which we’ve categorized the sessions. We’re fine with all of these approaches.
What we do want is for everyone who’s registering to tell us their preferences for each of the four time-slots. We'll be asking registrants to do that early in September, and then hopefully we’ll be able to assign people to sessions based pretty closely on their preferences. We’ll also be asking everyone to read as many of the papers as possible for the particular sessions they’ll be attending. That way we hope to insure that every presenter is speaking to a group of people not only interested in but also prepared to engage with the presenter’s work – this conference depends on both presenters and attenders and the insights they develop together! (By the way, if you’re coming but haven’t registered, please do that right away.)
Here’s the schedule for the 16 small-group sessions. We’ll be posting information in September about the plenaries and mealtime presentations as well.
1. Organizing and delivering clinical legal education
A. Deborah
Maranville (University of Washington School of Law), Russell Engler (New
England School of Law), Phyllis Goldfarb (George Washington University Law
School), Susan Kay (Vanderbilt University Law School), & Mary Lynch
(Albany Law School), “Revision
Quest: A Design Primer for Enhancing Experiential Education in the Law
School Curriculum”; and Karen Tokarz (Washington University
School of Law), Peggy Maisel (Florida International University College of
Law), Robert F. Seibel (California Western School of Law), &
Antoinette Sedillo Lopez (University of New Mexico School of Law),
“Universal
Clinical Legal Education: Why Clinical Courses Should Be Required for All
Law Graduates and How It Can Be Done” (Friday, 10:45 –
12:15)
B. Adele Bernhard (Pace University School of Law), “This
Porridge is Too Hot: Pre-Trial Misdemeanor Criminal Defense Clinics &
Innocence Projects -- Is Anything Just Right?”; and Mary Jo
Eyster (Brooklyn Law School) & Marjorie A. Silver (Touro College,
Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center), “The Accidental Clinician
and the Experienced Director: A Conversation on the Value of
Externships” (Friday, 2:15 -3:45)
C. Brook Baker
(Northeastern University School of Law), “Practice-Based
Learning: Emphasizing Practice and Offering Critical Perspectives on the
Dangers of ‘Co-op’tation”; and Jeff Selbin
(University of California, Berkeley School of Law) & Jeanne Charn
(Harvard Law School), “The Clinical Lab Office” (If you would
like a copy of this article, please contact the authors
directly) (Friday, 4:00 – 5:30)
D. Binny Miller (American
University, Washington College of Law), “Herding Cats:
The Role of Directors of Law School Clinical Programs”; and
Kimberly O’Leary (Thomas M. Cooley Law School), “Back to the
Future: Twenty-Five years after the Inspiration for the Future of the
In-House Clinic Report, What Have we Learned about In-House
Clinics?” (Saturday, 9:00 – 10:30)
2. Ethics, jurisprudence, and engagement with clients
A. Kate Kruse (University
of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law/Fordham University
School of Law), “The
New Legal Realist Voice of Clinician-Scholars”; and Mae Quinn
(Washington University School of Law, St. Louis), “Feminist
Legal Realism?” (Friday, 10:45 – 12:15)
B. Robert
Condlin (University of Maryland School of Law), "Bargaining
Without Law"; and Ann Shalleck (American University, Washington
College of Law) & Muneer Ahmad (Yale Law School), “The
Jurisprudential Underpinnings of Clinical Thought” (If you would
like a copy of this article, please contact the authors directly) (Friday,
2:15 – 3:45)
C. Susan Brooks (Earle Mack School of Law at Drexel
University) & Bob Madden (St. Joseph College), “Epistemology and Ethics
in Relationship-Centered Legal Education and Practice”; and
Nancy Cook (University of Minnesota Law School), “The Message is in the
Medium: Client Voice, Story, Narration, and Form” (Friday, 4:00
– 5:30)
D. Sue Bryant (City University of New York, School of
Law at Queens College) & Jean Koh Peters (Yale Law School), “Reflecting
on the Habits after Ten Years: Teaching about Race, Identity, Culture,
Language and Difference”; and Kathleen Kelly (Stanford Law
School), “Negotiating
Culture in Human Rights Clinical Field Work” (Saturday, 9:00
– 10:30)
3. Pedagogy
A. Peggy Cooper Davis (NYU School
of Law), “The Effects of
Experiential Courses on Students' Learning, Emotional Health, and Sense of
Professional Responsibility”; and Jennifer Lyman (D.C. Law
Students in Court), “Practicing What
We Teach” (Friday, 10:45 – 12:15)
B. Robert
Dinerstein & Elliott S. Milstein (American University, Washington
College of Law), “Uncertainty
and Indeterminacy as Over-arching Themes in Clinical Pedagogy”;
and Peter Hoffman (University of Houston Law Center), “Law
Schools and the Changing Face of Practice” (Friday, 2:15 –
3:45)
C. Laurie Morin & Susan Waysdorf (University of the
District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law), “The
Service-Learning Model in the Law School Curriculum: Expanding
Opportunities for the Ethical-Social Apprenticeship”; and Raja
Raghunath (University of Denver College of Law), “The ‘Plus
One’ Clinic: Tapping Into the Disorienting Possibilities in
Representing Landlords Alongside Tenants” (Friday, 4:00 –
5:30)
D. Ian Weinstein (Fordham University School of Law), “Sorting for
School Success and Developing Reflective Practice: From Educational to
Professional Markets”, and "Personality
-- Traits, Types and Styles: The Problem of Pirates and Ninjas";
and Richard Wilson (American University, Washington College of Law),
“Does
Global Clinical Legal Education Have, or Need, a Unifying
Theory?” (Saturday, 9:00 – 10:30)
4. Beyond
individual litigation: groups, transactions, and policy clinics
A. Robin S. Golden (Yale Law School), “Collaborative
as Client: Lawyering for Effective Change”; and Paul Tremblay
(Boston College Law School), “Counseling
Community Groups” (Friday, 10:45 – 12:15)
B. Brian
Glick (Fordham University School of Law), “Transactional Law &
Organizing”; and Robert Statchen (Western New England College
Schools of Law & Business), “Scribes,
Practitioners and Clinicians: Preparing Transactional Documents in a
Clinical Environment” (Friday, 2:15 – 3:45)
C. Edgar
Cahn (University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of
Law), “Clinical
Legal Education -- Where Next? Creating and Becoming Agents of
Change”; and Louise Trubek & Marsha Mansfield (University of
Wisconsin Law School), “Networking to Expand
Poverty Law Advocacy” (Friday, 4:00 – 5:30)
D.
Suzanne B. Goldberg (Columbia Law School), “Multidimensional
Advocacy: A Clinical Teaching Framework”; and Anita Weinberg
(Loyola University, Chicago, School of Law) & Elizabeth Cooper
(Fordham University School of Law), “(Re)constructing
Clinics in a Challenging Context: Teaching Policy and
Legislation” and charts (Saturday,
9:00 – 10:30)